Does it follow that the house has nothing in common with art and is architecture not to be included in the arts? Only a very small part of architecture belongs to art: the tomb and the monument. Everything else that fulfils a function is to be excluded from the domain of art.

Adolf Loos

The Quote in Other Words

Is it logical to assume that a house has no connection to art and that architecture should not be considered a part of the arts? The majority of architecture does not fall under the category of art, with the exception of the tomb and monument. Any other structure that serves a purpose should not be considered a part of the realm of art.

Explanation of the Quote

This quote suggests that architecture is not entirely an art form, but rather a functional discipline. The author argues that only a small portion of architecture, such as tombs and monuments, can be considered art. The rest of architecture, which serves a practical purpose, should not be included in the realm of art. This perspective challenges the traditional view of architecture as a form of artistic expression. However, it also highlights the importance of balancing functionality with aesthetics in architectural design. Ultimately, this quote raises questions about the definition of art and the role of architecture in society. It invites us to consider the relationship between form and function in the built environment and to explore the boundaries between art and utility.