No Congress ever has seen fit to amend the Constitution to address any issue related to marriage. No Constitutional Amendment was needed to ban polygamy or bigamy, nor was a Constitutional Amendment needed to set a uniform age of majority to ban child marriages.

Shawn Johnson

 

The Quote in Other Words

Throughout history, Congress has never deemed it necessary to modify the Constitution in regards to marriage matters. The prohibition of polygamy and underage marriages were both established without the need for a Constitutional Amendment.

 

Explanation of the Quote

This quote highlights the fact that the Constitution has not been amended to address any issues related to marriage. It argues that there was no need for a Constitutional Amendment to ban polygamy or bigamy, or to set a uniform age of majority to ban child marriages. This suggests that Congress has historically relied on other means to regulate marriage, such as state laws and court decisions.

However, this quote also raises questions about the role of the Constitution in shaping marriage laws. Should the Constitution be amended to address issues such as same-sex marriage or divorce? Or should these issues be left to the states to decide? These are complex questions that require careful consideration of the principles of federalism, individual rights, and social norms.

Ultimately, this quote reminds us that the Constitution is a living document that must adapt to changing social and cultural norms. As such, it is up to us as citizens to engage in thoughtful and informed debates about the role of the Constitution in shaping our laws and society.